<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Holiday Wish List:  How Would You Improve Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eastcoastblogging.com/2007/12/16/your-holiday-wish-list-how-would-you-improve-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eastcoastblogging.com/2007/12/16/your-holiday-wish-list-how-would-you-improve-twitter/</link>
	<description>A Look At The Local DC Tech Scene and Other Technology and Social Media Musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 23:53:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Embraces Groups</title>
		<link>http://eastcoastblogging.com/2007/12/16/your-holiday-wish-list-how-would-you-improve-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Embraces Groups</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eastcoastblogging.com/2007/12/16/your-holiday-wish-list-how-would-you-improve-twitter/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>[...] I for one am happy to see this. I have written a couple of posts recently, one about which service gives a better return on our investment and another on how we could improve Twitter . One argument I had in choosing Twitter over Facebook was the fact that Facebook was a little too spread out. I have to go to a lot of places to get a little done. And my one holiday wish for Twitter was groups. I think Facebook has take a step in the right direction. Having different groups that you can send messages to independently is a great feature. You could combine different Facebook groups into a particular group you define and have the ability to message the entire lot of them. Nick also had a great point about business contacts, or for that matter any group you want to pool together. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I for one am happy to see this. I have written a couple of posts recently, one about which service gives a better return on our investment and another on how we could improve Twitter . One argument I had in choosing Twitter over Facebook was the fact that Facebook was a little too spread out. I have to go to a lot of places to get a little done. And my one holiday wish for Twitter was groups. I think Facebook has take a step in the right direction. Having different groups that you can send messages to independently is a great feature. You could combine different Facebook groups into a particular group you define and have the ability to message the entire lot of them. Nick also had a great point about business contacts, or for that matter any group you want to pool together. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
