One Step Forward DC, Two Back

March 8, 2008 · Print This Article

It seems that the DC area cant get the monkey off its back, no matter how hard we try. As you have read here, as well as elsewhere, there is a groundswell of a pretty cool tech community building here in the DC area. Granted we are fighting many stigmas and preconceived notions about the area and its viability to produce solid startup ideas, nonetheless we continue to try. A little help would be nice though.

On the heels of a great Mashable event in DC the other night comes a not so glowing review. Those of us that were there had a great time chatting about the various projects everyone is working on, for profit or just for fun. It is continued evidence of a the great vibe here in the area. So to be honest I was more than a little disappointed to read an article from the Washington Post recapping the event. Dan Beyer’s started out with

Washington has been trying to build a Web 2.0 community for more than a year. A cluster of AOL alumni, local college graduates, and people in their 20s and early 30s are trying to show that D.C. can be, if not Silicon Valley, a major presence for social networking Web sites, user generated content and cutting-edge Web apps.

and I couldn’t agree more. It was how he finished off the article that took me a back a bit.

Therein lies one of the big issues facing the local Web scene. Local venture capitalists are pretty skeptical of these companies, many of which have big ideas for the Web but little idea about how to make money from those ideas.

Unclear what some, or all, of those companies do? Join the club. (Hey–I’m not a luddite–I use a bevy of Web 2.0 tools in my daily life and know what the programming framework Ruby on Rails is. I even like white boards, the method of choice for diagramming sites in meetings. But it’s not clear how all these ideas are going to turn into businesses.)

It is absolutely true that the VC business is just that, a business and they need to be assured of a promising return on their investment. But a little enthusiasm for the local team would not hurt would it. And while he is looking around to see what startups have viable money making business plans, he should look elsewhere. Is it only the local companies who need to find the holy grail to get funding ? I doubt it. Lets see, I am not sure even now, Twitter has a business model. They have a user base and that seems to be enough for them, because if you build it and the users come, money will follow some how or another. Has he seen some of the shitty products out there that have actually been funded … why do you think TechCrunch has a “Dead Pool”? and I don’t see too many DC startups on that list.

What kind of got me even more was his down tone on the local companies. We have an uphill battle we are fighting here to begin with and it does not help when the local mainstream media continues to question the locals attempts at success. Interestingly enough at the Mashable event I had a was chatting with Nick O’Neill and Aaron Brazell and Nick made mention he was happy to see some of the Post writers at the event, and how a lot of what is written in the local press is so negative about the community. So I was very happy to see this post the next day by Post writer Kim Hart. But then it was all tempered by this dash of negativism.

As a growing community, we need all the help we can get, especially from the mainstream media. Like it or not, that is how many get their news. Unless that news becomes a little more positive the road will be long and hard to show people the possibilities are here. A long road yes, an impossible drive, No.

Comments

4 Responses to “One Step Forward DC, Two Back”

  1. Will Meyer on March 8th, 2008 3:05 pm

    Word. I’m all for honest coverage, but if the local tech journalists aren’t pumping the scene, that speaks volumes. Come on folks, if you can get behind the Redskins, you can get behind a few well-intentioned geeks!

  2. jimmy on March 8th, 2008 3:17 pm

    Thanks for stopping by Will. Sorry I didnt get a chance to formally meet you the other night, I know it was a bit hectic.

    Yeah, a little love wouldn’t hurt all that much would it …

    Take care

    jimmy

  3. Shana on March 8th, 2008 6:17 pm

    I’m talking to another reporter at WaPo who is interested in covering “the scene”. He was there the other night and we’ve been emailing. I think we’ll get some positive coverage yet! Stay tuned!!

  4. Jared Goralnick on March 11th, 2008 10:06 pm

    Screw positive coverage, I want accurate coverage by technology reporters. I’d like one of three types of coverage for the DC tech scene:

    1. Coverage by someone who knows technology well enough to contrast both the varying technology scenes and the technologies being discussed. Right now we have generalists covering a scene and attempting to assess the technology.

    2. Coverage of the fact that there are events, but less editorial. Just tell the people this is happening, but don’t pass judgment if you’re not qualified. Facts, not opinions. That can be done by any reporter.

    3. No coverage. I care about our scene and we as tech bloggers will continue to report. I don’t want any mainstream coverage if it tells an inaccurate picture.

    Jimmy, I greatly appreciate your reporting on the scene. Shana, I’m glad that, like me and folks like Brian Williams & Peter Corbett, you’ve been trying to get the reporters to the right places. But honestly, I don’t want any reporting that doesn’t cover the facts. We need more tech journalists if we want tech coverage…

Got something to say?